Subject: [LM] Re: Proxy Datebook
mblevin@debian.org
Date: Fri Aug 06 1999 - 23:08:13 EDT
<19990806204324.a1666-@bgdarnel.rh.ncsu.edu> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/linkmaster/?start=22
> Are there deleted/archived records in the DatebookDB? I'm probably
not
> handling those correctly.
Yes, I'm sure that's it.
> > BTW - For the ActionNames proxy, they do make use of the matchCustom
> > field for sysAppLaunchCmdGoto. For a Datebook entry, you must make
> > sure that this field is zero. (1 for ToDo, 2 for Calls).
>
> I currently zero out the allocated GotoParams, so it's fine for now,
but
> I'll keep that in mind for the todo proxy. What are calls?
Calls are just ToDo entries with a category of "Calls".
ActionNames handles those specially.
> By the way, try "build-prc -t BooG ..." instead of kludging around
with
> replace_prctype. (Aren't undocumented functions fun? ;-))
D'oh! That would've been handy to know...
I am also planning a replace_dbversion. Is there a switch for that?
(not the version string... the actual UInt version)
-Mitch
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET WHAT YOU DESERVE! A NextCard Platinum VISA: DOUBLE Rewards points,
NO annual fee & rates as low as 9.9% FIXED APR. Apply online today!
http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/606
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/linkmaster
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying group communications
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Sep 05 2000 - 22:09:10 EDT